Mutton, M. Age., & Gilbride, K. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible matchmaking (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Thought similarity and you will relationships success one of matchmaking couples: An idiographic method

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). If I am not saying hot, are you sizzling hot or perhaps not?: Physical-appeal evaluations and you will relationships choice since a function of a person’s individual elegance. Emotional Science, 19, 669677. [ Website links ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other romantic relationship. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may incompatible dating (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of ambition. From inside the J. McV. Look (Ed.), Identification as well as the choices disorders (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Push. [ Hyperlinks ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Anticipating dating relationship fate that have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ perspective: Just who and you may what is expected issues. Individual Relationships, thirteen, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you can marital high quality inside the newlyweds: Several mainly based strategy. Diary out-of Personality and you may Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Internet dating. Washington, DC: Declaration for the Pew Web sites & Western Existence Venture. Retrieved , from [ Links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Determining the precision out-of predictions throughout the relationships matchmaking: Exactly how and just why create lovers’ forecasts change from men and women from observers? Identity and Societal Psychology Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing facts on the initiation away from heterosexual dating. Report presented in the Basic International Fulfilling toward Private Dating, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]

Merkle, E.Roentgen., & Richardson, R.An excellent. (2000). Electronic matchmaking and virtual related: Conceptualizing desktop mediated intimate relationship. Family unit members, forty-two, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]

Montoya, R. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Was real resemblance necessary for interest? A meta-investigation out-of genuine and you can thought of resemblance. Diary regarding Personal and personal Matchmaking, twenty five, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]

Morry, Meters. M. (2005). Relationship satisfaction as the a beneficial predictor away from similarity ratings; A test of one’s appeal-resemblance theory. Log out-of Personal and personal Relationships, twenty two, 561-584. [ Backlinks se webbplatsen ]

Record regarding Social and private Dating, 23, 865-880

Morry, M. M. (2007). The fresh appeal-resemblance theory one of get across-sex family members: Relationships satisfaction, identified similarities, and you may notice-helping attitudes. Record of Personal and personal Relationships, 24, 117-138. [ Backlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you will extension of your SVR theory out of dyadic combining. Journal off ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). That will divorce or separation: A beneficial fourteen-12 months longitudinal examination of black colored people and you can white partners. Log out-of Personal and personal Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]

Orenstein, S. (). This new love formula Fits believes it offers discover a formula to own ruling the web dating company: A scientific strategy to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Correct. Organization 2.0 Magazine. Recovered for the regarding [ Backlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Personality parallels into the lovers. Identity and Personal Variations, forty-five, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Spouse needs: What characteristics would folk notice in their small-name sexual and long-name close partners? Diary off Psychology and you may Person Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The fresh part of your own mind on the initiation and course of personal interaction. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may in conflict relationships (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]